data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44803/448031eff3a237b5c6639553e122aa306b352dde" alt=""
Are you kidding me? It makes me sick that a “story” (or in this case a fairy tale) on a website that is geared towards Joe six pack wannabe reporters and faux-tographers would be given credibility and be allowed to sway the stock market. Why was this story allowed to become fact before it was found to be untrue? It makes no sense that facts weren’t checked before this rumor was leaked into the financial world. Stories like this need to be investigated and fact checked before being leaked. It is insanely irresponsible for any credible news agency to reveal such a rumor based on some random person on a website like iReport.com. Journalism is hurting and stuff like this does nothing to help our cause.
To think that shareholders of Apple stock took a financial hit yesterday because someone thought it would be funny to play a little joke or to get ahead in a short sale of Apple stock while under the guise of a “reporter.” Hopefully, the person that did this will be held accountable for their actions and made an example of so people don’t pull stunts like this in the future.
If people want to snap photos of car crashes and whatever else they stumble upon while going about their daily lives, great. Photographers and reporters can't be everywhere. Sometimes people luck out with a nice frame on their point and shoot. But there is no place in the world of journalism for people who set up a situation so it appears to be news. It disgusts me that contributors of this nature are associated with professional journalism by calling them “citizen journalists.” Can I be a citizen pilot the next time I fly to New York? How about citizen doctor? I'm sure I can do a triple bypass operation, no problem.
Let’s be real here, these people aren’t journalists and shouldn’t be labeled as such. It is really killing the already struggling credibility of journalism.
3 comments:
The concept of citizen journalism isn't the problem in my opinion, it's the lazy way it has been implemented by shitty news organizations. We can't be everywhere and we have always relied on tips and pickups from "Joe Sixpack" (what happened to "Joe Bag-O-donuts?") while being skeptical and doing our "professional due-diligence" to ensure accuracy, fairness, and truth. CNN and many others, are skipping their part of the deal...
great post, Justin. I'm at j-school in NYC right now, where the topic comes up a lot in conversation- I'll post more tmrw when not typin via iPhone. but wanted to say thanks.
preach it, brother.
Post a Comment